Peer Review Process & Quality Assurance
Our Rigorous Peer Review Process
Every submission undergoes a thorough double-blind peer review to ensure scientific validity, methodological soundness, and significant contribution to the field of study.
1
Initial Editorial Check
Assessment for scope, formatting, and basic requirements
1-3 days
2
Peer Review
Double-blind review by 2-3 domain experts
2-4 weeks
3
Editorial Decision
Editor makes decision based on comprehensive reviewer feedback
1 week
4
Revision & Final Acceptance
Author revisions and final manuscript acceptance
1-3 weeks
Peer Review Evaluation Criteria
Originality
Novelty and innovation of research
Methodology
Appropriateness and rigor of methods
Results
Clarity and validity of findings
Significance
Contribution to the field
Possible Review Outcomes
Accept
Manuscript accepted as submitted
Minor Revisions
Small changes needed before acceptance
Major Revisions
Significant changes and re-review required
Reject
Manuscript does not meet journal standards
Reviewer Guidelines
- Provide constructive and objective feedback
- Maintain confidentiality of the review process
- Declare any conflicts of interest
- Complete reviews within agreed timeframe
- Focus on scientific quality and validity