Caveats For Researchers: Addressing The Target Sequential Effect In Unconscious Priming Studies

Mei-Ling Wang

Applied Psychology, School of Public Administration, Guizhou University of Finance and Economics, Guiyang, 550025, China

Jianhua Li

Department of Psychology, College of Teacher Education, Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua, 321004, China

Xin Zhang

Department of Psychology, School of Social and Behavior Sciences, Nanjing University, Nanjing, 210023, China


Abstract

Unconscious processing of visual stimuli is a crucial area of study, and it is essential to ensure that the processing is indeed unconscious. This study explores the methods for ascertaining unconscious processing, including subjective reports and the combination of subjective and objective measures. Blindsight, a phenomenon in which individuals exhibit above-chance accuracy in identifying "undetected" stimuli, even though they claim not to see them, serves as a prominent example. While some researchers argue that blindsight represents severely degraded processing, many others contend that it is evidence of unconscious visual processing. This paper delves into the subjectivity of reports in indicating unconsciousness to visual stimuli and explores the implications of blindsight for the understanding of unconscious processing.

How to Cite

Wang, M.-L., Li , J., & Zhang, X. (2024). CAVEATS FOR RESEARCHERS: ADDRESSING THE TARGET SEQUENTIAL EFFECT IN UNCONSCIOUS PRIMING STUDIES. Research Journal of Psychology, Sociology and Anthropology, 11(1), 12–25. Retrieved from https://nolandjournals.com/index.php/N26/article/view/765

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.